December 2, 2011

Robert S. Mueller III, Director
FBI Headquarters
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

Dear Director Robert S. Mueller III,

In reviewing both FBI documents and Warren County, Ohio Court documents, I have come across some interesting facts and inconsistencies. In a letter addressed to Mr. Lilley from the FBI Cincinnati Division, signed by Chief Division Counsel Michael E. Brooks, requested by: SSA Bailey, and dated: July 30, 2010 and again in a similar letter, dated: November 17, 2011 had stated;

Beginning in July 2008 you have provided the FBI Office in Cincinnati and Dayton with documentation which you claim warrant an FBI investigation into allegations of violations of your civil rights as the result of probate proceedings in Warren County, Ohio Courts. On July 1 2009 Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) Thomas Bailey telephonically informed you that the FBI will not initiate a federal criminal investigation into your allegations. Since that date you have provided additional materials and complaints.

At the request of SSA Bailey I have requested that FBI Cincinnati Chief Division Counsel (CDC) Michael Brooks review the material you provided both before and after his telephone call to you. It is the opinion of CDC Brooks that your allegations amount to your disagreement with various Warren County judicial officials over their ruling in state judicial proceedings. […]

Based upon the opinion of CDC Brooks no federal criminal investigation will be initiated by the FBI into you allegations.

1. The complaints that I filed were in regards to “Federal Civil Rights Statutes; Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law and Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241, Conspiracy Against Rights”. These are right secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States. As stated in the FBI letters “violations of your civil rights” and not “disagreement of rulings”.

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law:

This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both.

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights:

This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both.

2. The FBI letters had stated “allegations of violations of your civil rights as the result of probate proceedings”. The allegations of violations of my civil rights were as the result of “Civil Lawsuit proceedings”. The Civil Lawsuits were filed as the result of violations of my civil rights in “Probate Proceedings”. Both the probate and civil lawsuit proceedings were in gross violation of “Due Process of Law” as a result of “Arbitrary Power”.

3. The civil rights complaints involved three Judicial Officers, not just the presiding judge over the Civil Lawsuits; “Supreme Court assigned visiting judge David Sunderland, Warren County Court of Common Pleas Probate Division, Judge Michael E. Powell, and Warren County Court of Common Pleas and defendant, Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap.

4. Although the Conspiracy to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived of my rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States, had been conceived earlier than July of 2008 in the Civil Lawsuit Proceedings; the execution of the plot did not take place until September of 2008. Two months after I first informed the FBI of the crimes under the Federal Civil Rights Statutes “Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law and Conspiracy against Rights”.

5. I had four lawsuits filed in this case beginning May 9, 2006. The lawsuits were filed as a course to redress for damages that started with the embezzlement of my personal property in the sum of $100,000 (CD-4591) in the form of a Certificate of Deposit. My personal assets from (CD-4591) had been converted (stolen) on January 10, 1997 and remained in possession of Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap since that date.

I have tried various legal avenues to retain my rights as entitled under the Constitution and Laws of the United States only to be defeated by “Arbitrary Power” at every crossing. In a court of “Arbitrary Authority”, there in no “Due Process of Law” and no “Equality before the Law”; Due Process cannot exist under “Arbitrary Power”.

6. Also stated in the FBI letters “Since that date you have provided additional materials and complaints”; I have provided hundreds of document to the FBI and other DOJ agencies regarding “Color of Law Abuse” allegations and evidence of crimes committed by judicial officers under the Federal Civil Rights Statutes.

I had provided this evidence both before and after the crimes by judicial officers had been committed; depriving me of my rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States. While the FBI was fully aware of these crimes and had evidence in their possession; they had refused to protect my rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States.

7. Finally, the FBI letters states, “Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) Thomas Bailey telephonically informed you that the FBI will not initiate a federal criminal investigation into your allegations”. In conversations with Supervisory Special Agent Bailey, Victims Specialist James, Special Agent Miller, and other FBI and DOJ special agents and employees, I received dozens of different excuses and none of them were “disagreement of rulings”.

Some of the excuses on why the FBI and other DOJ agencies would not open a case where “We can pick and choose our cases”; this was the first and most logical excuse I received from the Cincinnati FBI Office. I suppose it means they can pick and choose which citizen of the United States they will entitle to be protected by the Constitution and Laws of the United States and which citizens they will not.

Other excuses were “we only take cases of one point five million, we only take cases of one point seven million, we don’t have the man power, does not warrant an investigation, we haven’t looked at your files yet, we only take Color of Law Abuse cases committed by law officers and security guards, not judges and prosecutors, we can’t find your file, does not belong in this section but if you check the DOJ website maybe you can find someone, and of course disagreement of rulings”. Over the next few years I will probably receive many more.

My personal property of $100,000 was not the only assets that had been embezzled under “Arbitrary Power”; a $50,000 Certificate or Deposit belonging to my brother was also embezzled by judicial officers. Seven years after my brother had been deprived of his personal property and rights under the Constitution and Laws of the United States, he passed away, never to recover his personal property held in the possession of Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap.

Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. – Fourteenth Amendment

Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap had allegedly broken many other laws as well; my brother was disabled and unable to work due to a stroke, depriving a disabled person of his personal finances has some serious charges. Among these are “Disability Abuse, Financial Abuse, Economic Abuse, Abuse of Process, and Abuse of Authority” just to name a few.

Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap was serving as an administrator an attorney for compensation at the same time while serving as a Magistrate. A judge, even a Magistrate is not allowed to serve as a fiduciary or practice law for compensation.

According to the case files, Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap had been double-dipping; she had paid herself nearly $28,000 as an Estate Administrator and Attorney while working as a salary paid Chief Magistrate for the Warren County Court of Common Pleas; paying herself as an Administrator and Attorney while the taxpayers were paying her as a Public Servant for the same time spent”.

Besides the $150,000 of personal assets of Stephen and Christopher that the Judicial Officers had embezzled under “Arbitrary Power”, there appeared to be nearly a $100,000 embezzled from the estate that Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap had control of as well. The exact amount could never be determined; Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap and Warren County Probate Judge Michael E. Powell would never hold a “Hearing on Account” during the Probate Proceedings and never allow heir to the estate, Stephen R. Lilley to review the estate documents. This is also a violation of Due Process and Deprivation of my Rights under Color of Law.

Approximately a quarter million had been embezzled from Stephen, Christopher, and the Estate that we know of and another, approximately quarter million had been bled off as legal fees by the attorneys involved. Nearly a half million dollars all together ended up in the hands of the attorneys and judges in this scheme to defraud, which all started by the conversion of two non-probate savings accounts by a Warren County Court of Common Pleas Chief Magistrate who was illegally serving as an Administrator and Attorney for the estate. It’s no surprise on why the FBI does not want to get involved in this miscarriage of justice. It would be much simpler and less embarrassing just to sweep it under the rug and cover it up.

The first complaint that I filed with the Cincinnati FBI Office in July 2008 was for violations of FRCP Rule 34, Production of Documents and Things in the Civil Lawsuit Proceedings. During the civil procedures, Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap had refused to produce the Administrators Documents for the estate; Judge Sunderland would not compel the documents. To this date I have never been allowed to review the documents from my mother’s estate that Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap held in her possession. Again, this is a violation of Due Process and Deprivation of my Rights under Color of Law. It also raises a number of red flags; there must be more in my mother’s estate documents than Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap and Probate Court Judge Michael E. Powell would like to have revealed.

During the entire civil lawsuit period against three lawyers, a Chief Magistrate, and a layman, the court would not allow me to obtain one single document, deposition, or interrogatory for the Civil Lawsuit Proceedings. A gross violation of Due Process of Law, Equality under the Law, Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law, and Conspiracy against Rights.

These are just some of the reasons on why the FBI and DOJ would not open a case on the civil rights complaints that I had filed, and had nothing to do with “disagreement of rulings”. If a Federal Criminal Investigation was opened and investigated properly; the exposure of the embezzled quarter million and who received the money would be exposed, along with the double-dipping and other tortious acts. Judges would lose their gravy jobs and pensions and the racket would be exposed. I would receive compensation for damages as entitled under the Constitution and Laws of the Land for the fifteen years of damages and suffering from judicial corruption which would probably to come out of Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap pocket and other defendants, their insurances companies, or possibly the State.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley